The Journal of International Arbitration jaunākajā numurā publicēts RJA doktorantūras studenta raksts Arbitration in Latvia: A Cautionary Tale?, kas detalizēti izklāsta šķīrējtiesu regulējuma attīstību Latvijā un ar to saistītos Latvijas Republikas Satversmes tiesas spriedumus, kā arī kritiski analizē jauno Šķīrējtiesu likumu, kas stājās spēkā 2015. gada 1. janvārī. Raksta abstrakts (angļu valodā): This article endeavours to explore the thorny development of arbitration in Latvia. Having started off on the wrong foot in the 1990s, the arbitration environment in Latvia is still far from being perfect. Contrary to its neighbouring Baltic states, Latvia has continuously ignored the possibility of adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law and currently deals with the adverse consequences of an ill-functioning arbitration system, rather than provides for appealing and efficient arbitration environment. All the more, by introducing disproportionately strict qualification requirements for arbitrators and still not providing a mechanism for challenging arbitral awards, the recently adopted 2015 Law on Arbitration is a severe disregard of fundamental international arbitration principles and standards Toms Krūmiņš, 'Arbitration in Latvia: A Cautionary Tale?' (2017) 34 Journal of International Arbitration, Issue 2, pp. 303–331 Raksts pieejams šeit.
Ziņas